Skip Nav

Argument Essays on The Death Penalty

Legal Stuff

❶Supporters of the death penalty believe when someone takes a life, the balance of justice is disturbed and that the only way to restore the justice is by executing

41 comments

Helping students improve writing skills since 2000!
Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people. Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment.

If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this. There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures.

But, in reality, the only individuals who can attest to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death. And, yes, there are those who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served.

But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court. And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment.

Those who argue in favor of death sentence often resort to logic. However, the subject of the death sentence cannot be addressed on a logical perspective alone because it carries many emotional, moral, and religious elements. In this essay, I will give my personal views on why I support the death penalty. From the sub-cellar of the Hotel Empire in the infamous Tenderloin red-light district, a ghastly stench begins to rise from something burning in the furnace, distressing the guests who call in the police to investigate the source of the foul smell.

The police pour a few buckets of water into the furnace to put out the fire only to discover a chilling scene. The horror comes in the form of a round, blackened object resembling a barbecued soccer ball. Upon closer investigation, they discover it is a human head with most of the hair and flesh burned off. They also find the bloody murder weapon—a meat cleaver—and the rest of the body laying nearby.

Once again, this is a separate issue. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing.

The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly.

This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.

Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

The Death Penalty Argumentative Essay Abolish Death Penalty Although death penalty is a fair punishment, I am against it because it is another form of murder which is an inhumane act. Death penalty is capital punishment wherein a criminal proven guilty of a .

Privacy FAQs

The death penalty is the punishment of execution, carried out legally against an individual convicted of a capital crime. Those who support the death penalty might argue that it is just, and deters further murders, while others against it may argue that it is inhumane and it doesn’t solve any core problems in that person’s life.

About Our Ads

An argumentative essay about death penalty. The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself. Essay Death Penalty. in , states that have the death penalty had the same or higher murder rates as those that don’t. However, some of the lowest crime rates on the planet belong to China, a country to which the death penalty is hardly a stranger.

Cookie Info

The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on. Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases. The Death Penalty, Argumentative Essay Sample October 21, Gloria Kopp Writing Samples 8 The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on.